Contract
JUDAI
the citation graph

Miranda v. Arizona

1966-06-13 · Supreme Court of the United States · United States

read the judgment

34What it rests on
12Relied on since
0Departed from

Relied on since

The judgments that cite this one. This is the answer that tells you the case is still alive.

12 judgments have relied on it, across 1966–2026

first 1966 · last 2026 · busiest 1966 (1 judgments)

What it rests on

1966-06-13Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States1965-06-07Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States×21965-04-05Pointer v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States×21964-06-22Escobedo v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States×61964-06-22Jackson v. Denno, WardenSupreme Court of the United States×21964-06-15Malloy v. Hogan, SheriffSupreme Court of the United States×41963-05-27Haynes v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States×41963-03-25Lynumn v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States×41963-03-18FAY, WARDEN, Et Al. v. NOIASupreme Court of the United States×21963-03-18Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States×41963-03-18SHOTWELL MANUFACTURING CO. Et Al. v. UNITED STATESSupreme Court of the United States×31962-04-30Carnley v. Cochran, Corrections DirectorSupreme Court of the United States×31961-10-09Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States×41961-06-19Culombe v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States×31960-01-11Blackburn v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States×21958-10-13Crooker v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States×41958-06-30Cicenia v. Lagay, Superintendent, New Jersey State Prison FarmSupreme Court of the United States×41953-06-15Stein v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States×31951-11-13United States v. CarignanSupreme Court of the United States×41949-10-10Brinegar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States×21944-05-01ASHCRAFT Et Al. v. TENNESSEESupreme Court of the United States×41943-06-07Tot v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States×21943-03-01ANDERSON Et Al. v. UNITED STATESSupreme Court of the United States×31942-02-09Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States×21940-02-12CHAMBERS Et Al. v. FLORIDASupreme Court of the United States×31938-05-31Johnson v. Zerbst, WardenSupreme Court of the United States×31936-02-17BROWN Et Al. v. MISSISSIPPISupreme Court of the United States×41924-10-13Ziang Sung Wan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States×41912-02-19Powers v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States×31897-12-13Bram v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States×41896-04-27Wilson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States×41886-02-01Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States×31884-03-03Hopt v. People of the Territory of UtahSupreme Court of the United States×41821-03-18Cohens v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States×2

220 point outside the corpus. Read from the text, but no judgment held here answers to them. They are counted rather than hidden: this corpus is a slice, not the law.