Chimel v. California

1969-06-23 · Supreme Court of the United States · United States

6What it rests on

6Relied on since

0Departed from

Relied on since

The judgments that cite this one. This is the answer that tells you the case is still alive.

19691 judgments19701 judgments19711 judgments19731 judgments5 years silent19781 judgments5 years silent19831 judgments

6 judgments have relied on it, across 1969–1983

first 1969 · last 1983 · busiest 1969 (1 judgments)

1983-03-15UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ronald Glen SHAW, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit 1978-06-21Jessie Ray JONES, Appellant, v. the STATE of Texas, AppelleeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas 1973-05-29Schneckloth, Conservation Center Superintendent v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States 1971-06-21Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States 1970-02-06UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Ronald Raymond RAVICH and Edward McConnell, Defendants-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit 1969-06-23Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States

What it rests on

1969-06-23Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States 1967-12-18Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States×2 1966-06-13Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States×2 1961-10-09Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States×2 1949-10-10Brinegar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States×2 1886-02-01Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States×2

125 point outside the corpus. Read from the text, but no judgment held here answers to them. They are counted rather than hidden: this corpus is a slice, not the law.

Departed from

No judgment recorded a departure from this one.

Departure is not detected yet, and the gap is deliberate. Searching for the words the Court might use was measured on 1,019 judgments: "depart from" appears 100 times and most often means departing from the facts found by a domestic court; "overruled" appears 44 times, usually about a domestic judgment; "abandon" appears 123 times, most often as abandoned firearms. Tightened to require the Court itself as the subject, precision was still around 40%, the rest being a dissenting judge complaining, or a national supreme court departing from its own case-law. Telling a lawyer an authority is dead when it is alive is worse than saying nothing, so nothing is what this says until each candidate can be judged properly.

not characterised

Most citations carry no word at all. The Court does not always say what it is doing when it cites one of its own judgments, and where it stayed silent nothing is inferred here.