Contract
JUDAI
the citation graph

NEULINGER AND SHURUK v. SWITZERLAND

2009-01-08 · European Court of Human Rights · Council of Europe

read the judgment

1What it rests on
41Relied on since
0Departed from

Relied on since

The judgments that cite this one. This is the answer that tells you the case is still alive.

41 judgments have relied on it, across 2011–2026

first 2011 · last 2026 · busiest 2025 (7 judgments)

2026-07-02A.P. AND R.P. v. POLANDEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2026-04-09NOVÁK v. THE CZECH REPUBLICEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2026-03-17D.A. AND R.A. v. THE UNITED KINGDOMEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2025-12-16Z AND OTHERS v. FINLANDEuropean Court of Human Rights×2followed2025-11-06KYRIAN v. THE CZECH REPUBLICEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2025-07-09UKRAINE AND THE NETHERLANDS v. RUSSIAEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2025-06-24A AND B v. MALTAEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2025-06-24D.G. AND S.G. v. SERBIAEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2025-06-10Á.F.L. v. ICELANDEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2025-06-10B.T. AND B.K.CS. v. HUNGARYEuropean Court of Human Rights2024-12-03GIANNAKOPOULOS v. GREECEEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2024-10-08ZAVRIDOU v. CYPRUSEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2024-05-16MIRZOYAN v. THE CZECH REPUBLICEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2024-05-02THE J. PAUL GETTY TRUST AND OTHERS v. ITALYEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2023-11-28KRACHUNOVA v. BULGARIAEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2023-11-16G.T.B. v. SPAINEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2023-05-23I.S. v. GREECEEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2023-04-13E.K. v. LATVIAEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2023-03-21SIMONA MIHAELA DOBRE v. ROMANIAEuropean Court of Human Rights2023-01-23MACATĖ v. LITHUANIAEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2022-11-10N.V. AND C.C. v. MALTAEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2022-10-11BEELER v. SWITZERLANDEuropean Court of Human Rights2022-09-20POPADIĆ v. SERBIAEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2022-05-03P.D. v. RUSSIAEuropean Court of Human Rights×2followed2022-03-24A.M. v. NORWAYEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2021-12-10ABDI IBRAHIM v. NORWAYEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2020-05-28Z v. BULGARIAEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2019-09-10STRAND LOBBEN AND OTHERS v. NORWAYEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2018-03-15NAÏT-LIMAN v. SWITZERLANDEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2017-11-30STRAND LOBBEN AND OTHERS v. NORWAYEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2017-01-24PARADISO AND CAMPANELLI v. ITALYEuropean Court of Human Rights×2followed2016-11-08EL GHATET v. SWITZERLANDEuropean Court of Human Rights×2followed2016-06-21AL-DULIMI AND MONTANA MANAGEMENT INC. v. SWITZERLANDEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2016-06-21NAIT-LIMAN v. SWITZERLANDEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2015-01-27PARADISO AND CAMPANELLI v. ITALYEuropean Court of Human Rights×2followed2014-03-25BIAO v. DENMARKEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2013-11-26AL-DULIMI AND MONTANA MANAGEMENT INC. v. SWITZERLANDEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2013-11-26X v. LATVIAEuropean Court of Human Rights×2followed2012-12-13DE SOUZA RIBEIRO v. FRANCEEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2012-09-12NADA v. SWITZERLANDEuropean Court of Human Rights×2followed2011-12-13X v. LATVIAEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed

What it rests on

6 point outside the corpus. Read from the text, but no judgment held here answers to them. They are counted rather than hidden: this corpus is a slice, not the law.

Bianchi v. Switzerland, no. 7548/04Iglesias Gil and A.U.I. v. Spain, no. 56673/00Ismailova v. Russia, no. 37614/02Maire v. Portugal, no. 48206/99Monory v. Romania and Hungary, no. 71099/01Sylvester v. Austria, nos. 36812/97