the citation graph
PARADISO AND CAMPANELLI v. ITALY
2015-01-27 · European Court of Human Rights · Council of Europe
9What it rests on
24Relied on since
0Departed from
Relied on since
The judgments that cite this one. This is the answer that tells you the case is still alive.
+3 earlier20212 judgments20226 judgments20235 judgments20242 judgments20254 judgments20261 judgments
24 judgments have relied on it, across 2017–2026
first 2017 · last 2026 · busiest 2022 (6 judgments)
2026-07-02A.P. AND R.P. v. POLANDEuropean Court of Human Rights×2followed2025-11-06KYRIAN v. THE CZECH REPUBLICEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2025-07-10KORNIYETS AND OTHERS v. UKRAINEEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2025-07-03M.K. v. LATVIAEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2025-05-15VERSACI v. ITALYEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2024-12-10MARTINEZ ALVARADO v. THE NETHERLANDSEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2024-10-17CENTRAL UNITARIA DE TRABALLADORES/AS v. SPAINEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2023-06-22GIULIANO GERMANO v. ITALYEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2023-04-13JÍROVÁ AND OTHERS v. THE CZECH REPUBLICEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2023-01-31Y v. FRANCEEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2023-01-23MACATĖ v. LITHUANIAEuropean Court of Human Rights2023-01-17FEDOTOVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIAEuropean Court of Human Rights2022-12-08PEJŘILOVÁ v. THE CZECH REPUBLICEuropean Court of Human Rights2022-12-06K.K. AND OTHERS v. DENMARKEuropean Court of Human Rights×2followed2022-05-31ARNAR HELGI LÁRUSSON v. ICELANDEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2022-05-05LIA v. MALTAEuropean Court of Human Rights2022-03-24A.M. v. NORWAYEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2022-03-24C.E. AND OTHERS v. FRANCEEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2021-06-01DENIS AND IRVINE v. BELGIUMEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2021-02-02X AND OTHERS v. BULGARIAEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2019-10-08DENIS AND IRVINE v. BELGIUMEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2019-09-10STRAND LOBBEN AND OTHERS v. NORWAYEuropean Court of Human Rights2018-12-04ILNSEHER v. GERMANYEuropean Court of Human Rights2017-11-30STRAND LOBBEN AND OTHERS v. NORWAYEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed
What it rests on
2012-09-12NADA v. SWITZERLANDEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2009-01-08NEULINGER AND SHURUK v. SWITZERLANDEuropean Court of Human Rights×2followed2008-01-22E.B. v. FRANCEEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2002-02-26KUTZNER v. GERMANYEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2001-10-11SAHIN v. GERMANYEuropean Court of Human Rights×2followed2000-07-13SCOZZARI AND GIUNTA v. ITALYEuropean Court of Human Rights×2followed2000-04-27K. AND T. v. FINLANDEuropean Court of Human Rights×3followed2000-02-01MAZUREK v. FRANCEEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2000-01-25IGNACCOLO-ZENIDE v. ROMANIAEuropean Court of Human Rights
15 point outside the corpus. Read from the text, but no judgment held here answers to them. They are counted rather than hidden: this corpus is a slice, not the law.
Mennesson v. France, no. 65192/11 ×2Pontes v. Portugal, no. 19554/09 ×2Couillard Maugery v. France, no. 64796/01Covezzi and Morselli v. Italy, no. 52763/99Czech 16 PARADISO AND CAMPANELLI v. ITALY JUDGMENT Republic, no. 23848/04Haase v. Germany, no. 11057/02Labassee v. France, no. 65941/11Maire v. Portugal, no. 48206/99Maumousseau and Washington v. France, no. 93388/05Moretti and Benedetti v. Italy, no. 16318/07Pini and Others v. Romania, nos. 78028/01Saviny v. Ukraine, no. 39948/06Wagner and J.M.W.L. v. Luxembourg, no. 76240/01