the citation graph
X v. LATVIA
2013-11-26 · European Court of Human Rights · Council of Europe
11What it rests on
22Relied on since
0Departed from
Relied on since
The judgments that cite this one. This is the answer that tells you the case is still alive.
+2 earlier20191 judgments20224 judgments20235 judgments20245 judgments20252 judgments20261 judgments
22 judgments have relied on it, across 2016–2026
first 2016 · last 2026 · busiest 2023 (5 judgments)
2026-04-09NOVÁK v. THE CZECH REPUBLICEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2025-12-16Z AND OTHERS v. FINLANDEuropean Court of Human Rights2025-09-09M.P. AND OTHERS v. GREECEEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2024-11-26I.B.A. v. SWITZERLANDEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2024-09-17P.J. AND R.J. v. SWITZERLANDEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2024-08-27NAMIK YÜKSEL v. TÜRKİYEEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2024-05-16MIRZOYAN v. THE CZECH REPUBLICEuropean Court of Human Rights2024-02-20WA BAILE v. SWITZERLANDEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2023-11-16G.T.B. v. SPAINEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2023-07-11SEMENYA v. SWITZERLANDEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2023-03-21SIMONA MIHAELA DOBRE v. ROMANIAEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2023-02-14BYČENKO v. LITHUANIAEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2023-01-23MACATĖ v. LITHUANIAEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2022-12-06K.K. AND OTHERS v. DENMARKEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2022-11-10N.V. AND C.C. v. MALTAEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2022-05-31ARNAR HELGI LÁRUSSON v. ICELANDEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2022-05-03P.D. v. RUSSIAEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2019-01-29GÜZELYURTLU AND OTHERS v. CYPRUS AND TURKEYEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2017-03-30NAGMETOV v. RUSSIAEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2017-02-23DE TOMMASO v. ITALYEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2017-01-24PARADISO AND CAMPANELLI v. ITALYEuropean Court of Human Rights×2followed2016-11-08EL GHATET v. SWITZERLANDEuropean Court of Human Rights
What it rests on
2011-09-27DIAMANTE AND PELLICCIONI v. SAN MARINOEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2010-07-13KURIĆ AND OTHERS v. SLOVENIAEuropean Court of Human Rights2009-01-08NEULINGER AND SHURUK v. SWITZERLANDEuropean Court of Human Rights×2followed2007-03-22MASLOV v. AUSTRIAEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2006-11-21DEMİR AND BAYKARA v. TURKEYEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2003-10-09SLIVENKO v. LATVIAEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2000-04-27K. AND T. v. FINLANDEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2000-02-16AMANN v. SWITZERLANDEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2000-01-25IGNACCOLO-ZENIDE v. ROMANIAEuropean Court of Human Rights×21999-02-18WAITE AND KENNEDY v. GERMANYEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed1999-01-21GARCÍA RUIZ v. SPAINEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed
19 point outside the corpus. Read from the text, but no judgment held here answers to them. They are counted rather than hidden: this corpus is a slice, not the law.
B. v. Belgium, no. 4320/11 ×2Carlson v. Switzerland, no. 49492/06 ×2Kampanella v. Italy, no. 14737/09 ×2Maumousseau and Washington v. France, no. 39388/05 ×2As occurred in Sylvester v. Austria, nos. 36812/97Bajrami v. Albania, no. 35853/04Broka v. Latvia, no. 70926/01Hansen v. Turkey, no. 36141/97Iglesias Gil and A.U.I. v. Spain, no. 56673/00Iglesias Gil and A.U.I. v. Spain, no. 56673/90Iosub Caras v. Romania, no. 7198/04Korbely v. Hungary [GC], no. 9174/02Maire v. Portugal, no. 48206/99Raban v. Romania, no. 25437/08The leading case is Monory v. Romania and Hungary, no. 71099/01