Contract
JUDAI
the citation graph

DENIS AND IRVINE v. BELGIUM

2019-10-08 · European Court of Human Rights · Council of Europe

read the judgment

3What it rests on
33Relied on since
0Departed from

Relied on since

The judgments that cite this one. This is the answer that tells you the case is still alive.

33 judgments have relied on it, across 2022–2026

first 2022 · last 2026 · busiest 2025 (11 judgments)

2026-05-19K.A. v. AUSTRIAEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2026-04-09H.D. v. ITALYEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2026-02-03NAVALNYY v. RUSSIA (No. 4)European Court of Human Rightsfollowed2025-12-11TSAAVA AND OTHERS v. GEORGIAEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2025-12-09STEPHAN KUCERA v. AUSTRIAEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2025-11-06B.M. v. SPAINEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2025-08-26ATANASIJE RISTIĆ v. SERBIAEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2025-07-31SIEDLECKA v. POLANDEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2025-07-09UKRAINE AND THE NETHERLANDS v. RUSSIAEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2025-06-25KOVAČEVIĆ v. BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINAEuropean Court of Human Rights2025-06-10B.T. AND B.K.CS. v. HUNGARYEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2025-05-20MATCHAVARIANI v. GEORGIAEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2025-05-13SPITERI v. MALTAEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2025-02-06M.B. v. SPAINEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2024-10-22J.B. AND OTHERS v. MALTAEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2024-06-25UKRAINE v. RUSSIA (RE CRIMEA)European Court of Human Rightsfollowed2024-04-23AYDIN SEFA AKAY v. TÜRKİYEEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2024-04-09LAZĂR v. ROMANIAEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2024-04-09MATTHEWS AND JOHNSON v. ROMANIAEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2023-11-27COMMUNAUTÉ GENEVOISE D'ACTION SYNDICALE (CGAS) v. SWITZERLANDEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2023-10-17A.D. v. MALTAEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2023-06-01GROSAM v. THE CZECH REPUBLICEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2023-04-04GASHI AND GINA v. ALBANIAEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2023-04-04RADONJIĆ AND ROMIĆ v. SERBIAEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2023-03-09L.B. v. HUNGARYEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2023-03-02DZERKORASHVILI AND OTHERS v. GEORGIAEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2023-01-24KUTAYEV v. RUSSIAEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2023-01-17FEDOTOVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIAEuropean Court of Human Rights2022-12-13BJERG v. DENMARKEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2022-11-10RIMŠĒVIČS v. LATVIAEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2022-09-13GILANOV v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVAEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2022-06-21P.W. v. AUSTRIAEuropean Court of Human Rights2022-06-09SAVICKIS AND OTHERS v. LATVIAEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed

What it rests on

3 point outside the corpus. Read from the text, but no judgment held here answers to them. They are counted rather than hidden: this corpus is a slice, not the law.

Dufoort v. Belgium, no. 43653/09Nevmerjitski v. Ukraine, no. 54825/00Zervudacki v. France, no. 73947/01