the citation graph
GROSAM v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC
2023-06-01 · European Court of Human Rights · Council of Europe
13What it rests on
0Relied on since
0Departed from
Relied on since
No judgment held here cites it.
What it rests on
2023-01-17FEDOTOVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIAEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2022-11-03VEGOTEX INTERNATIONAL S.A. v. BELGIUMEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2020-05-28FARZALIYEV v. AZERBAIJANEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2019-10-08DENIS AND IRVINE v. BELGIUMEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2019-07-18RUSTAVI 2 BROADCASTING COMPANY LTD AND OTHERS v. GEORGIAEuropean Court of Human Rights2018-10-30GESTUR JÓNSSON AND RAGNAR HALLDÓR HALL v. ICELANDEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2018-09-25DENISOV v. UKRAINEEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2018-03-20RADOMILJA AND OTHERS v. CROATIAEuropean Court of Human Rights×2followed2017-02-23DE TOMMASO v. ITALYEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2013-01-09OLEKSANDR VOLKOV v. UKRAINEEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2006-11-23JUSSILA v. FINLANDEuropean Court of Human Rights2002-06-20AZINAS v. CYPRUSEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2001-01-11PLATAKOU v. GREECEEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed
9 point outside the corpus. Read from the text, but no judgment held here answers to them. They are counted rather than hidden: this corpus is a slice, not the law.
Bayer v. Germany, no. 8453/04Government cited Ciupercescu v. Romania, no. 35555/03Government cited Saquetti Iglesias v. Spain, no. 50514/13Gurepka v. Ukraine, no. 61406/00Hartburg v. Austria, no. 47195/06Peleki v. Greece, no. 69291/12Vilho Eskelinen and Others v. Finland [GC], no. 63235/00Wierzbicki v. Poland, no. 24541/94Zaicevs v. Latvia, no. 65022/01