Contract
JUDAI
the citation graph

ROCHESTER TELEPHONE CORP. v. UNITED STATES Et Al.

1939-04-17 · Supreme Court of the United States · United States

read the judgment

14What it rests on
5Relied on since
0Departed from

Relied on since

The judgments that cite this one. This is the answer that tells you the case is still alive.

5 judgments have relied on it, across 1940–1943

first 1940 · last 1943 · busiest 1942 (2 judgments)

What it rests on

1938-12-05SHIELDS Et Al. v. UTAH IDAHO CENTRAL RAILROAD CO.Supreme Court of the United States1938-04-04SHANNAHAN Et Al., TRUSTEES, v. UNITED STATES Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States1938-02-28UNITED STATES Et Al. v. GRIFFIN Et Al., RECEIVERSSupreme Court of the United States1928-05-14GREAT NORTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY, v. UNITED STATES Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States1927-02-21UNITED STATES Et Al. v. LOS ANGELES & SALT LAKE RAILROAD COMPANYSupreme Court of the United States1926-05-03COLORADO v. UNITED STATES Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States1925-01-05The Delaware and Hudson Company Et Al. v. United States and Interstate Commerce CommissionSupreme Court of the United States1924-03-03The Chicago Junction CaseSupreme Court of the United States1917-05-21United States Et Al. v. Illinois Central Railroad CompanySupreme Court of the United States1917-03-26Lehigh Valley Railroad Company v. United States of America and Interstate Commerce CommissionSupreme Court of the United States1912-06-07Hooker v. Knapp Et Al., Members of the Interstate Commerce Commission; Eagle White Lead Company v. Interstate Commerce CommissionSupreme Court of the United States1912-06-07Procter & Gamble Company v. United States of America, Interstate Commerce Commission, Cincinnati, Hamilton & Dayton Railway Company, Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States1911-02-20Muskrat v. United States; Brown and Gritts v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States1907-02-25Texas and Pacific Railway Company v. Abilene Cotton Oil CompanySupreme Court of the United States

42 point outside the corpus. Read from the text, but no judgment held here answers to them. They are counted rather than hidden: this corpus is a slice, not the law.