the citation graph
ASSOCIATED INDUSTRIES OF NEW YORK STATE, Inc., v. ICKES, Secretary of the Interior, Et Al.
1943-02-08 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · United States
23What it rests on
6Relied on since
0Departed from
Relied on since
The judgments that cite this one. This is the answer that tells you the case is still alive.
19531 judgments12 years silent19651 judgments19661 judgments19681 judgments19702 judgments
6 judgments have relied on it, across 1953–1970
first 1953 · last 1970 · busiest 1970 (2 judgments)
1970-03-09BARLOW Et Al. v. COLLINS, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, ALABAMA AGRICULTURAL STABILIZATION AND CONSERVATION SERVICE, Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States1970-03-03ASSOCIATION OF DATA PROCESSING SERVICE ORGANIZATIONS, INC., Et Al. v. CAMP, COMPTROLLER OF THE CURRENCY, Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States1968-06-10FLAST Et Al. v. COHEN, SECRETARY OF HEALTH, EDUCATION, AND WELFARE, Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States1966-03-25Office of Communication of the United Church of Christ, Aaron Henry, Robert L. T. Smith and United Church of Christ at Tougaloo v. Federal Communications Commission, Lamar Life Broadcasting Company, IntervenorD.C. Circuit1965-12-29Scenic Hudson Preservation Conference, Town of Cortlandt, Town of Putnam Valley and Town of Yorktown v. Federal Power Commission, and Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc., IntervenerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit1953-06-23READE v. EWING, Federal Security Adm’rCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit
What it rests on
1942-04-06Scripps-Howard Radio, Inc. v. Federal Communications CommissionSupreme Court of the United States1940-12-16L. SINGER & SONS Et Al. v. UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD CO.Supreme Court of the United States1940-04-29PERKINS, SECRETARY OF LABOR, Et Al. v. LUKENS STEEL CO. Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States1940-03-25Federal Communications Commission v. Sanders Brothers Radio StationSupreme Court of the United States1940-01-29Federal Communications Commission v. Pottsville Broadcasting Co.Supreme Court of the United States1940-01-02AMERICAN FEDERATION OF LABOR Et Al. v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARDSupreme Court of the United States1939-06-05COLEMAN Et Al. v. MILLER, SECRETARY OF THE SENATE OF THE STATE OF KANSAS, Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States1939-04-17ROCHESTER TELEPHONE CORP. v. UNITED STATES Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States1939-01-30TENNESSEE ELECTRIC POWER CO. Et Al. v. TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States1938-01-03ALABAMA POWER CO. v. ICKES, FEDERAL EMERGENCY ADMINISTRATOR OF PUBLIC WORKS, Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States1938-01-03DUKE POWER CO. Et Al. v. GREENWOOD COUNTY Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States1937-03-29VIRGINIAN RAILWAY CO. v. SYSTEM FEDERATION NO. 40, RAILWAY EMPLOYEES DEPARTMENT OF THE AMERICAN FEDERATION OF LABOR, Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States1937-03-01AETNA LIFE INSURANCE CO. v. HAWORTH Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States1936-02-22GREENWOOD COUNTY, S. C., Et Al. v. DUKE POWER CO. Et Al.Fourth Circuit1933-05-08FEDERAL RADIO COMMISSION v. NELSON BROTHERS BOND & MORTGAGE CO. (Station WIBO)Supreme Court of the United States1933-01-09INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION Et Al. v. OREGON-WASHINGTON RAILROAD & NAVIGATION CO. Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States1930-04-14ALEXANDER SPRUNT & SON, INC., Et Al. v. UNITED STATESSupreme Court of the United States1925-06-01Pierce, Governor of Oregon, Et Al. v. Society of Sisters; Pierce, Governor of Oregon, Et Al. v. Hill Military AcademySupreme Court of the United States1924-03-03The Chicago Junction CaseSupreme Court of the United States1923-06-11Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Mellon, Secretary of the Treasury, Et Al.; Frothingham v. Mellon, Secretary of the Treasury, Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States1915-11-01Truax and the Attorney General of the State of Arizona v. RaichSupreme Court of the United States1911-02-20Muskrat v. United States; Brown and Gritts v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States1902-11-17American School of Magnetic Healing v. McAnnultySupreme Court of the United States
36 point outside the corpus. Read from the text, but no judgment held here answers to them. They are counted rather than hidden: this corpus is a slice, not the law.