Lehigh Valley Railroad Company v. United States of America and Interstate Commerce Commission

1917-03-26 · Supreme Court of the United States · United States

read the judgment

1What it rests on

5Relied on since

0Departed from

Relied on since

The judgments that cite this one. This is the answer that tells you the case is still alive.

19241 judgments19271 judgments11 years silent19382 judgments19391 judgments

5 judgments have relied on it, across 1924–1939

first 1924 · last 1939 · busiest 1938 (2 judgments)

1939-04-17ROCHESTER TELEPHONE CORP. v. UNITED STATES Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States 1938-04-04SHANNAHAN Et Al., TRUSTEES, v. UNITED STATES Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States 1938-02-28UNITED STATES Et Al. v. GRIFFIN Et Al., RECEIVERSSupreme Court of the United States 1927-02-21UNITED STATES Et Al. v. LOS ANGELES & SALT LAKE RAILROAD COMPANYSupreme Court of the United States 1924-03-03The Chicago Junction CaseSupreme Court of the United States

What it rests on

1912-06-07Procter & Gamble Company v. United States of America, Interstate Commerce Commission, Cincinnati, Hamilton & Dayton Railway Company, Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States

Departed from

No judgment recorded a departure from this one.

Departure is not detected yet, and the gap is deliberate. Searching for the words the Court might use was measured on 1,019 judgments: "depart from" appears 100 times and most often means departing from the facts found by a domestic court; "overruled" appears 44 times, usually about a domestic judgment; "abandon" appears 123 times, most often as abandoned firearms. Tightened to require the Court itself as the subject, precision was still around 40%, the rest being a dissenting judge complaining, or a national supreme court departing from its own case-law. Telling a lawyer an authority is dead when it is alive is worse than saying nothing, so nothing is what this says until each candidate can be judged properly.

not characterised

Most citations carry no word at all. The Court does not always say what it is doing when it cites one of its own judgments, and where it stayed silent nothing is inferred here.