Contract

the citation graph

STRELETZ, KESSLER AND KRENZ v. GERMANY

2001-03-22 · European Court of Human Rights · Council of Europe

read the judgment

1What it rests on

26Relied on since

0Departed from

Relied on since

The judgments that cite this one. This is the answer that tells you the case is still alive.

+10 earlier20211 judgments20221 judgments20233 judgments20244 judgments20251 judgments20262 judgments

26 judgments have relied on it, across 2004–2026

first 2004 · last 2026 · busiest 2024 (4 judgments)

2026-07-16R.B. v. ITALYEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed 2026-05-28PETRIGNANI AND OTHERS v. ITALYEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed 2025-04-15BĂDESCU AND OTHERS v. ROMANIAEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed 2024-08-27YASAK v. TÜRKİYEEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed 2024-06-25UKRAINE v. RUSSIA (RE CRIMEA)European Court of Human Rightsfollowed 2024-05-23SAAKASHVILI v. GEORGIAEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed 2024-04-23SACHARUK v. LITHUANIAEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed 2023-12-12JASUITIS AND ŠIMAITIS v. LITHUANIAEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed 2023-09-26YÜKSEL YALÇINKAYA v. TÜRKİYEEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed 2023-09-07BAVČAR v. SLOVENIAEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed 2022-05-19BEŽANIĆ AND BAŠKARAD v. CROATIAEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed 2021-02-02X AND OTHERS v. BULGARIAEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed 2019-11-21ILIAS AND AHMED v. HUNGARYEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed 2017-04-04GÜZELYURTLU AND OTHERS v. CYPRUS AND TURKEYEuropean Court of Human Rights×2followed 2015-10-20VASILIAUSKAS v. LITHUANIAEuropean Court of Human Rights×2followed 2013-10-21DEL RÍO PRADA v. SPAINEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed 2013-07-25KHODORKOVSKIY AND LEBEDEV v. RUSSIAEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed 2012-11-13MOCANU AND OTHERS v. ROMANIAEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed 2012-07-10DEL RÍO PRADA v. SPAINEuropean Court of Human Rights×2followed 2010-07-06NEULINGER AND SHURUK v. SWITZERLANDEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed 2010-05-17KONONOV v. LATVIAEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed 2008-07-24KONONOV v. LATVIAEuropean Court of Human Rights×2followed 2008-02-12KAFKARIS v. CYPRUSEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed 2007-07-12JORGIC v. GERMANYEuropean Court of Human Rights 2005-07-06NACHOVA AND OTHERS v. BULGARIAEuropean Court of Human Rights 2004-02-26NACHOVA AND OTHERS v. BULGARIAEuropean Court of Human Rights

What it rests on

2000-11-28REHBOCK v. SLOVENIAEuropean Court of Human Rights×2followed

Departed from

No judgment recorded a departure from this one.

Departure is not detected yet, and the gap is deliberate. Searching for the words the Court might use was measured on 1,019 judgments: "depart from" appears 100 times and most often means departing from the facts found by a domestic court; "overruled" appears 44 times, usually about a domestic judgment; "abandon" appears 123 times, most often as abandoned firearms. Tightened to require the Court itself as the subject, precision was still around 40%, the rest being a dissenting judge complaining, or a national supreme court departing from its own case-law. Telling a lawyer an authority is dead when it is alive is worse than saying nothing, so nothing is what this says until each candidate can be judged properly.

not characterised

Most citations carry no word at all. The Court does not always say what it is doing when it cites one of its own judgments, and where it stayed silent nothing is inferred here.