Contract
JUDAI
the citation graph

DEL RÍO PRADA v. SPAIN

2012-07-10 · European Court of Human Rights · Council of Europe

read the judgment

6What it rests on
40Relied on since
0Departed from

Relied on since

The judgments that cite this one. This is the answer that tells you the case is still alive.

40 judgments have relied on it, across 2015–2026

first 2015 · last 2026 · busiest 2022 (8 judgments)

2026-07-16R.B. v. ITALYEuropean Court of Human Rights×3followed2026-05-28PETRIGNANI AND OTHERS v. ITALYEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2026-02-03NAVALNYY v. RUSSIA (No. 4)European Court of Human Rights2026-01-27KHADIJA ISMAYILOVA v. AZERBAIJAN (No. 4)European Court of Human Rightsfollowed2025-07-31SIEDLECKA v. POLANDEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2025-07-09UKRAINE AND THE NETHERLANDS v. RUSSIAEuropean Court of Human Rights2025-06-24PĂCURAR v. ROMANIAEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2025-05-20MATCHAVARIANI v. GEORGIAEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2025-05-13SPITERI v. MALTAEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2025-04-15BĂDESCU AND OTHERS v. ROMANIAEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2024-12-19EPISCOPO AND BASSANI v. ITALYEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2024-10-22J.B. AND OTHERS v. MALTAEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2024-10-17CESARANO v. ITALYEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2024-10-10ALPERIN v. UKRAINEEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2024-09-17YAYLALI v. SERBIAEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2024-08-27YASAK v. TÜRKİYEEuropean Court of Human Rights2024-05-23SAAKASHVILI v. GEORGIAEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2024-04-09GEORGIA v. RUSSIA (IV)European Court of Human Rightsfollowed2023-10-17A.D. v. MALTAEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2023-09-26YÜKSEL YALÇINKAYA v. TÜRKİYEEuropean Court of Human Rights×2followed2023-07-06TULEYA v. POLANDEuropean Court of Human Rights×2followed2023-03-07MAMASAKHLISI AND OTHERS v. GEORGIA AND RUSSIAEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2023-03-02DZERKORASHVILI AND OTHERS v. GEORGIAEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2022-11-10KUPINSKYY v. UKRAINEEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2022-11-08GAGGL v. AUSTRIAEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2022-10-18MØRCK JENSEN v. DENMARKEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2022-10-13BOUTON v. FRANCEEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2022-07-12KOTLYAR v. RUSSIAEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2022-06-14STOYANOVA v. BULGARIAEuropean Court of Human Rights2022-06-07TAGANROG LRO AND OTHERS v. RUSSIAEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2022-05-31GALEANO PEÑAS v. SPAINEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2021-06-01DENIS AND IRVINE v. BELGIUMEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2020-12-22GESTUR JÓNSSON AND RAGNAR HALLDÓR HALL v. ICELANDEuropean Court of Human Rights×2followed2020-02-13N.D. AND N.T. v. SPAINEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2019-10-08BALSAMO v. SAN MARINOEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2018-12-04ILNSEHER v. GERMANYEuropean Court of Human Rights×2followed2018-10-30GESTUR JÓNSSON AND RAGNAR HALLDÓR HALL v. ICELANDEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2017-01-24KHAMTOKHU AND AKSENCHIK v. RUSSIAEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2016-12-15KHLAIFIA AND OTHERS v. ITALYEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2015-10-20VASILIAUSKAS v. LITHUANIAEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed

What it rests on

12 point outside the corpus. Read from the text, but no judgment held here answers to them. They are counted rather than hidden: this corpus is a slice, not the law.

Grava v. Italy, no. 43522/98 ×3Gurguchiani v. Spain, no. 16012/06 ×2M. v. Germany, no. 19359/04 ×2Achour v. France [GC], no. 67335/01Alexanian v. Russia, no. 46468/06Fatullayev v. Azerbaijan, no. 40984/07Oshurko v. Ukraine, no. 33108/05Pilla v. Italy, no. 64088/00