Contract
JUDAI
the citation graph

KÁROLY NAGY v. HUNGARY

2017-09-14 · European Court of Human Rights · Council of Europe

read the judgment

13What it rests on
16Relied on since
0Departed from

Relied on since

The judgments that cite this one. This is the answer that tells you the case is still alive.

16 judgments have relied on it, across 2018–2026

first 2018 · last 2026 · busiest 2025 (4 judgments)

What it rests on

18 point outside the corpus. Read from the text, but no judgment held here answers to them. They are counted rather than hidden: this corpus is a slice, not the law.

Boulois v. Luxembourg [GC], no. 37575/04 ×3ECHR 2002-IX. 15 See Cudak v. Lithuania [GC], no. 15869/02January 2001. 44 Ahtinen v. Finland, no. 48907/99J.S. and A.S. v. Poland, no. 40732/98Krupko and Others v. Russia, no. 26587/07McElhinney v. Ireland, no. 31253/96Prince Hans-Adam II of Liechtenstein v. Germany [GC], no. 42527/98Sabeh El Leil v. France [GC], no. 34869/05See Ferrazzini v. Italy [GC], no. 44759/98See Markovic and Others v. Italy [GC], no. 1398/03See Obst v. Germany, no. 425/03Sergey Denisov v. Russia, no. 21566/13Siebenhaar v. Germany, no. 18136/02Vilho Eskelinen and Others v. Finland [GC], no. 63235/00Vilho Eskelinen v. Finland [GC], no. 63235/00XI. 79 See Svyato-Mykhaylivska Parafiya v. Ukraine, no. 77703/01