Contract
JUDAI
the citation graph

BLOKHIN v. RUSSIA

2013-11-14 · European Court of Human Rights · Council of Europe

read the judgment

6What it rests on
31Relied on since
0Departed from

Relied on since

The judgments that cite this one. This is the answer that tells you the case is still alive.

31 judgments have relied on it, across 2016–2026

first 2016 · last 2026 · busiest 2017 (4 judgments)

2026-05-12Y v. SERBIAEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2026-04-21E.H. v. GERMANYEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2026-04-07CEKIĆ v. SERBIAEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2025-11-04VAINIK AND OTHERS v. ESTONIAEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2025-07-17OPALENKO v. UKRAINEEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2025-06-12KRPELÍK v. THE CZECH REPUBLICEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2025-04-29JAUPI v. ALBANIAEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2024-11-26SOUROULLAS KAY AND ZANNETTOS v. CYPRUSEuropean Court of Human Rights2024-10-10ELDAR HASANOV v. AZERBAIJANEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2024-08-29PASQUINELLI AND OTHERS v. SAN MARINOEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2024-08-27W.R. v. THE NETHERLANDSEuropean Court of Human Rights2023-10-17A.D. v. MALTAEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2023-06-29KHAVSHABOVA v. GEORGIAEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2023-05-02STRASSENMEYER v. GERMANYEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2022-06-23GROSAM v. THE CZECH REPUBLICEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2021-04-06HANDZHIYSKI v. BULGARIAEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2020-05-28Z v. BULGARIAEuropean Court of Human Rights2019-08-27MAGNITSKIY AND OTHERS v. RUSSIAEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2019-06-20A AND B v. CROATIAEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2019-01-31ROOMAN v. BELGIUMEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2018-11-15NAVALNYY v. RUSSIAEuropean Court of Human Rights2018-11-09BEUZE v. BELGIUMEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2018-09-20ALIYEV v. AZERBAIJANEuropean Court of Human Rights2018-03-20RADOMILJA AND OTHERS v. CROATIAEuropean Court of Human Rights2017-12-19LOPES DE SOUSA FERNANDES v. PORTUGALEuropean Court of Human Rights×2followed2017-11-28MERABISHVILI v. GEORGIAEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2017-09-14KÁROLY NAGY v. HUNGARYEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2017-05-12SIMEONOVI v. BULGARIAEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2016-12-15KHLAIFIA AND OTHERS v. ITALYEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2016-12-13BÉLÁNÉ NAGY v. HUNGARYEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2016-11-29LUPENI GREEK CATHOLIC PARISH AND OTHERS v. ROMANIAEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed

What it rests on

21 point outside the corpus. Read from the text, but no judgment held here answers to them. They are counted rather than hidden: this corpus is a slice, not the law.

Adamkiewicz v. Poland, no. 54729/00Dayanan v. Turkey, no. 7377/03D.G. v. Ireland, no. 39474/98Ichin and Others v. Ukraine, nos. 28189/04Insanov v. Azerbaijan, no. 16133/08Khudobin v. Russia, no. 59696/00Makeyev v. Russia, no. 13769/04Maksim Petrov v. Russia, no. 23185/03Martin v. Estonia, no. 35985/09Mirilashvili v. Russia, no. 6293/04Mouisel v. France, no. 67263/01M. v. Germany, no. 19359/04Nevmerzhitsky v. Ukraine, no. 54825/00Ostendorf v. Germany, no. 15598/08P. and S. v. Poland, no. 57375/08Panovits v. Cyprus, no. 4268/04Pavlenko v. Russia, no. 42371/02Pishchalnikov v. Russia, no. 7025/04Popov v. Russia, no. 26853/04Shimovolos v. Russia, no. 30194/09Wenerski v. Poland, no. 44369/02