Contract
JUDAI
the citation graph

Ruth PANTER Et Al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. MARSHALL FIELD & CO. Et Al., Defendants-Appellees; Richard WEISS Et Al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. MARSHALL FIELD & CO., Defendants-Appellees

1981-07-06 · Seventh Circuit · United States

read the judgment

21What it rests on
5Relied on since
0Departed from

Relied on since

The judgments that cite this one. This is the answer that tells you the case is still alive.

5 judgments have relied on it, across 1983–1987

first 1983 · last 1987 · busiest 1985 (2 judgments)

1987-12-30John BERSHAD, Plaintiff Below, Appellant, v. CURTISS-WRIGHT CORPORATION, a Delaware Corporation, and Dorr-Oliver Inc., a Delaware CorporationSupreme Court of Delaware1985-11-20John A. MORAN and the Dyson-Kissner-Moran Corporation, Plaintiffs Below-Appellants, and Gretl Golter, Individually and in a Derivative Capacity, Plaintiff Intervenor Below-Appellant, v. HOUSEHOLD INTERNATIONAL, INC., a Delaware Corporation, Donald C. Clark, Thomas D. Flynn, Mary Johnston Evans, William D. Hendry, Joseph W. James, Mitchell P. Kartalia, Gordon P. Osler, Arthur E. Rasmussen, George W. Rauch, James M. Tait, Miller Upton, Bernard F. Brennan and Gary G. Dillon, Defendants Below-AppelleesSupreme Court of Delaware1985-01-29John A. MORAN and the Dyson-Kissner-Moran Corporation, Plaintiffs, and Gretl Golter, Individually and in a Derivative Capacity, Plaintiff Intervenor, v. HOUSEHOLD INTERNATIONAL, INC. a Delaware Corporation, Donald C. Clark, Thomas D. Flynn, Mary Johnston Evans, William D. Hendry, Joseph W. James, Mitchell P. Kartalia, Gordon P. Osler, Arthur E. Rasmussen, George W. Rauch, James M. Tait, Miller Upton, Bernard F. Brennan and Gary G. Dillon, Defendants; HOUSEHOLD INTERNATIONAL, INC., Counterclaim Plaintiff, v. John A. MORAN, Charles H. Dyson and the Dyson-Kissner-Moran Corporation, Counterclaim DefendantsCourt of Chancery of Delaware1984-06-21Bernard POGOSTIN, Ann Brown and Irwin J. Newman, Plaintiffs Below, Appellants, v. W. Thomas RICE, Eliot H. Stein, Fred Sullivan, A. Lightfoot Walker, Arthur C. Babson, Francis L. Cappaert, Edwin I. Hatch, Peter C. Huang, George T. Scharfenberger, Joe E. Lonning, Daniel E. Lyons, Stephen E. O’Neil, Eben W. Pyne, John H. Washburn and City Investing Company, Defendants Below, AppelleesSupreme Court of Delaware1983-09-22Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 99,501 Buffalo Forge Company, Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation, and Ampco-Pittsburgh Securities II Corporation, Cross-Appellees v. Ogden Corporation, Cross-Appellant, and David R. Newcomb, Raymond J. Popp, Thomas W. Burke, Edward W. Duffy, John R. Gregory, and Frederick S. PierceCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit

What it rests on

1980-11-17Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 97,603, Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 97,705 Treadway Companies, Inc. v. Care Corporation, Robert W. Browne, Daniel Cowin and Philip Dejourno, Care Corporation, Robert W. Browne and Philip Dejourno, Counterclaim v. Fair Lanes, Inc., Treadway Companies, Inc., Daniel Parke Lieblich, John R. McDonnell Simon Gluckman, Norman Brassler, Murray L. Cole, Samuel B. Dobrow and Bernard Mills, Counterclaim Care Corporation and Philip Dejourno, Suing Derivatively in the Right and for the Benefit of Treadway Companies, Inc., Counterclaim v. Fair Lanes, Inc., Daniel Parke Lieblich, John R. McDonnell Simon Gluckman, Norman Brassler, Murray L. Cole, Samuel B. Dobrow and Bernard Mills, Counterclaim and Treadway Companies, Inc., Nominal CounterclaimCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit1980-11-14CROUSE-HINDS COMPANY, Plaintiff-Counterclaim-Defendant-Appellant, v. INTERNORTH, INC., and IN Holdings, Inc., Defendants-Counterclaim-Plaintiffs-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit1980-08-19Johnson, Gilbert P. And Johnson, Hervey M. v. Samuel J. Trueblood, Arnold E. Trueblood, Harvey I. Salwen, and Penn Eastern Development Company Gilbert Johnson and Hervey Johnson, Individually and Derivatively on Behalf of Penn Eastern Development CorporationThird Circuit1977-10-20Charles KAPLAN, Plaintiff, v. Robert S. GOLDSAMT, Bernard J. Korman, Alan B. Miller, Leonard W. Cronkhite, Jr., Thomas L. Kempner, Leonard M. Leiman, Louis Rones, J. Irving Schwartz, Joseph Ziegler and American Medicorp, Inc., DefendantsCourt of Chancery of Delaware1977-09-23Louis S. SINGER and Mollie Singer, Plaintiffs Below, Appellants, v. the MAGNAVOX COMPANY Et Al., Defendants Below, AppelleesSupreme Court of Delaware1977-03-23SANTA FE INDUSTRIES, INC., Et Al. v. GREEN Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States1976-06-14TSC INDUSTRIES, INC., Et Al. v. NORTHWAY, INC.Supreme Court of the United States1975-10-06BLUE CHIP STAMPS Et Al. v. MANOR DRUG STORESSupreme Court of the United States1975-07-29George S. PETTY, Plaintiff, v. PENNTECH PAPERS, INC., a Delaware Corporation, Et Al., DefendantsCourt of Chancery of Delaware1975-06-17Rondeau v. Mosinee Paper Corp.Supreme Court of the United States1974-01-10Louis S. GIMBEL, III, Plaintiff, v. the SIGNAL COMPANIES, INC., Et Al., DefendantsCourt of Chancery of Delaware1972-06-12AFFILIATED UTE CITIZENS OF UTAH Et Al. v. UNITED STATES Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States1971-10-20John PUMA, Plaintiff, v. J. Willard MARRIOTT Et Al., DefendantsCourt of Chancery of Delaware1971-06-18SINCLAIR OIL CORPORATION, Defendant Below, Appellant, v. Francis S. LEVIEN, Plaintiff Below, AppelleeSupreme Court of Delaware1970-01-26MILLS Et Al. v. ELECTRIC AUTO-LITE CO. Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States1966-06-03Esther R. Warshaw, Plaintiff Below, Appellant, vs. W. K. Calhoun, Charles F. Curry, F. W. Duboc, Ray B. Duboc, Robert M. Duboc, W. L. Gench, John Latshaw, K. H. Mead, C. C. Otto, Western Casualty and Surety Company, a Kansas Corporation, and the Western Insurance Securities Company, a Delaware Corporation, Defendants Below, AppelleesSupreme Court of Delaware1964-03-17Cheff v. MathesSupreme Court of Delaware1962-12-28Bennett v. ProppSupreme Court of Delaware1960-02-18Kors v. CareyCourt of Chancery of Delaware1944-04-24SARTOR Et Al. v. ARKANSAS NATURAL GAS CORP.Supreme Court of the United States1943-02-01SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION v. CHENERY CORPORATION Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States

59 point outside the corpus. Read from the text, but no judgment held here answers to them. They are counted rather than hidden: this corpus is a slice, not the law.