Rondeau v. Mosinee Paper Corp.

1975-06-17 · Supreme Court of the United States · United States

read the judgment

3What it rests on

4Relied on since

0Departed from

Relied on since

The judgments that cite this one. This is the answer that tells you the case is still alive.

19801 judgments19811 judgments19831 judgments19841 judgments

4 judgments have relied on it, across 1980–1984

first 1980 · last 1984 · busiest 1980 (1 judgments)

1984-10-09Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 91,674 Kevin D. Flynn, John H. Jacobs, and John J. Deluca. On Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated v. Bass Brothers Enterprises, Inc. National Alfalfa Dehydrating and Milling Company, Anne H. Bass, Anne T. Bass, Edward P. Bass, Nancy Lee Bass, Perry R. Bass, Robert M. Bass, Sid R. Bass, W. Fred Massey, Charles R. Peterson, and Richard E. RainwaterThird Circuit 1983-09-22Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 99,501 Buffalo Forge Company, Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation, and Ampco-Pittsburgh Securities II Corporation, Cross-Appellees v. Ogden Corporation, Cross-Appellant, and David R. Newcomb, Raymond J. Popp, Thomas W. Burke, Edward W. Duffy, John R. Gregory, and Frederick S. PierceCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit 1981-07-06Ruth PANTER Et Al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. MARSHALL FIELD & CO. Et Al., Defendants-Appellees; Richard WEISS Et Al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. MARSHALL FIELD & CO., Defendants-AppelleesSeventh Circuit 1980-11-17Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 97,603, Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 97,705 Treadway Companies, Inc. v. Care Corporation, Robert W. Browne, Daniel Cowin and Philip Dejourno, Care Corporation, Robert W. Browne and Philip Dejourno, Counterclaim v. Fair Lanes, Inc., Treadway Companies, Inc., Daniel Parke Lieblich, John R. McDonnell Simon Gluckman, Norman Brassler, Murray L. Cole, Samuel B. Dobrow and Bernard Mills, Counterclaim Care Corporation and Philip Dejourno, Suing Derivatively in the Right and for the Benefit of Treadway Companies, Inc., Counterclaim v. Fair Lanes, Inc., Daniel Parke Lieblich, John R. McDonnell Simon Gluckman, Norman Brassler, Murray L. Cole, Samuel B. Dobrow and Bernard Mills, Counterclaim and Treadway Companies, Inc., Nominal CounterclaimCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit

What it rests on

1970-01-26MILLS Et Al. v. ELECTRIC AUTO-LITE CO. Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States 1964-06-08J. I. CASE CO. Et Al. v. BORAKSupreme Court of the United States 1944-02-28The Hecht Company v. Bowles, Price AdministratorSupreme Court of the United States

11 point outside the corpus. Read from the text, but no judgment held here answers to them. They are counted rather than hidden: this corpus is a slice, not the law.

Departed from

No judgment recorded a departure from this one.

Departure is not detected yet, and the gap is deliberate. Searching for the words the Court might use was measured on 1,019 judgments: "depart from" appears 100 times and most often means departing from the facts found by a domestic court; "overruled" appears 44 times, usually about a domestic judgment; "abandon" appears 123 times, most often as abandoned firearms. Tightened to require the Court itself as the subject, precision was still around 40%, the rest being a dissenting judge complaining, or a national supreme court departing from its own case-law. Telling a lawyer an authority is dead when it is alive is worse than saying nothing, so nothing is what this says until each candidate can be judged properly.

not characterised

Most citations carry no word at all. The Court does not always say what it is doing when it cites one of its own judgments, and where it stayed silent nothing is inferred here.