Contract
JUDAI
the citation graph

LINDON, OTCHAKOVSKY-LAURENS AND JULY v. FRANCE

2007-10-22 · European Court of Human Rights · Council of Europe

read the judgment

3What it rests on
22Relied on since
0Departed from

Relied on since

The judgments that cite this one. This is the answer that tells you the case is still alive.

22 judgments have relied on it, across 2010–2026

first 2010 · last 2026 · busiest 2024 (4 judgments)

2026-01-08TAFZI EL HADRI AND EL IDRISSI MOUCH v. SPAINEuropean Court of Human Rights2025-12-15DANILEŢ v. ROMANIAEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2025-11-25AZADLIQ NEWSPAPER v. AZERBAIJANEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2024-10-08KAJGANIĆ v. SERBIAEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2024-08-27BIELAU v. AUSTRIAEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2024-06-25UKRAINE v. RUSSIA (RE CRIMEA)European Court of Human Rightsfollowed2024-03-19ALMEIDA ARROJA v. PORTUGALEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2023-09-12EIGIRDAS AND VĮ "DEMOKRATIJOS PLĖTROS FONDAS" v. LITHUANIAEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2023-09-05RADIO BROADCASTING COMPANY B92 AD v. SERBIAEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2023-05-15SANCHEZ v. FRANCEEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2022-10-06MUSTAFA HAJILI AND OTHERS v. AZERBAIJANEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2022-09-15ANATOLIY YEREMENKO v. UKRAINEEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2022-04-05TESLENKO AND OTHERS v. RUSSIAEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2016-06-23BAKA v. HUNGARYEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2016-05-17KARÁCSONY AND OTHERS v. HUNGARYEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2015-06-16DELFI AS v. ESTONIAEuropean Court of Human Rights×3followed2015-04-23MORICE v. FRANCEEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2014-09-16KARÁCSONY AND OTHERS v. HUNGARYEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2013-10-10DELFI AS v. ESTONIAEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2013-07-11MORICE v. FRANCEEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2012-02-07AXEL SPRINGER AG v. GERMANYEuropean Court of Human Rights2010-07-27AKSU v. TURKEYEuropean Court of Human Rights

What it rests on

8 point outside the corpus. Read from the text, but no judgment held here answers to them. They are counted rather than hidden: this corpus is a slice, not the law.

Chauvy and Others v. France, no. 64915/01 ×2Brasilier v. France, no. 71343/01Feldek v. Slovakia, no. 29032/95Klubs v. Latvia, no. 57829/00Radio France and Others v. France, no. 53984/00White v. Sweden, no. 42435/02Wirtschafts-Trend Zeitschriften- Verlags GmbH v. Austria, no. 58547/00