Contract
JUDAI
the citation graph

ANHEUSER-BUSCH INC. v. PORTUGAL

2007-01-11 · European Court of Human Rights · Council of Europe

read the judgment

3What it rests on
41Relied on since
0Departed from

Relied on since

The judgments that cite this one. This is the answer that tells you the case is still alive.

41 judgments have relied on it, across 2010–2025

first 2010 · last 2025 · busiest 2022 (9 judgments)

2025-11-27VUJOVIĆ AND LIPA D.O.O. v. MONTENEGRO (No. 2)European Court of Human Rights×2followed2025-11-18ISKRA DOO BEOGRAD v. SERBIAEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2025-10-07ŠABANOVIĆ AND OTHERS v. SERBIAEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2025-05-15SEKSIMP GROUP SRL v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVAEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2025-05-13RADELIĆ v. CROATIAEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2025-01-09ZAFFERANI AND OTHERS v. SAN MARINOEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2025-01-07UAB PROFARMA AND UAB BONA DIAGNOSIS v. LITHUANIAEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2024-09-17YAYLALI v. SERBIAEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2024-06-25UKRAINE v. RUSSIA (RE CRIMEA)European Court of Human Rightsfollowed2024-05-02THE J. PAUL GETTY TRUST AND OTHERS v. ITALYEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2023-10-17BÎZDÎGA v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVAEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2023-10-05ANDRZEJ RUCIŃSKI v. POLANDEuropean Court of Human Rights×2followed2023-09-12WIEDER AND GUARNIERI v. THE UNITED KINGDOMEuropean Court of Human Rights×2followed2023-06-22KUBÁT AND OTHERS v. THE CZECH REPUBLICEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2023-05-09JEHOVAH'S WITNESSES v. FINLANDEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2023-02-02AKSHIN GARAYEV v. AZERBAIJANEuropean Court of Human Rights2023-01-26VALVERDE DIGON v. SPAINEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2023-01-19DOMENECH ARADILLA AND RODRÍGUEZ GONZÁLEZ v. SPAINEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2023-01-19KOROTYUK v. UKRAINEEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2022-12-15GHERARDI MARTIRI v. SAN MARINOEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2022-10-11THEO NATIONAL CONSTRUCT S.R.L. v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVAEuropean Court of Human Rights2022-10-06JUSZCZYSZYN v. POLANDEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2022-09-15M.K. v. UKRAINEEuropean Court of Human Rights2022-09-13BAŞER AND ÖZÇELİK v. TÜRKİYEEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2022-09-01SAFAROV v. AZERBAIJANEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2022-07-07FERHATOVIĆ v. SLOVENIAEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2022-06-16RAMIZ JAFAROV v. AZERBAIJANEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2022-03-17FU QUAN, S.R.O. v. THE CZECH REPUBLICEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2020-01-28ALİ RIZA AND OTHERS v. TURKEYEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2019-07-18RUSTAVI 2 BROADCASTING COMPANY LTD AND OTHERS v. GEORGIAEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2018-09-25DENISOV v. UKRAINEEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2018-03-20RADOMILJA AND OTHERS v. CROATIAEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2018-03-15NAÏT-LIMAN v. SWITZERLANDEuropean Court of Human Rights×2followed2017-03-14ILIAS AND AHMED v. HUNGARYEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2016-12-13BÉLÁNÉ NAGY v. HUNGARYEuropean Court of Human Rights×2followed2016-06-21NAIT-LIMAN v. SWITZERLANDEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2015-12-01KÁROLY NAGY v. HUNGARYEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2014-05-27BAKA v. HUNGARYEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2012-06-07CENTRO EUROPA 7 S.R.L. AND DI STEFANO v. ITALYEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2012-04-03KOTOV v. RUSSIAEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2010-04-01DENISOVA AND MOISEYEVA v. RUSSIAEuropean Court of Human Rights

What it rests on

3 point outside the corpus. Read from the text, but no judgment held here answers to them. They are counted rather than hidden: this corpus is a slice, not the law.

Cabourdin v. France, no. 60796/00Lecarpentier v. France, no. 67847/01Maurice v. France [GC], no. 11810/03