Contract
JUDAI
the citation graph

MAESTRI v. ITALY

2004-02-17 · European Court of Human Rights · Council of Europe

read the judgment

4What it rests on
34Relied on since
0Departed from

Relied on since

The judgments that cite this one. This is the answer that tells you the case is still alive.

34 judgments have relied on it, across 2004–2026

first 2004 · last 2026 · busiest 2022 (8 judgments)

2026-07-07GRANDE ORIENTE D'ITALIA v. ITALYEuropean Court of Human Rights2026-01-08FERRIERI AND BONASSISA v. ITALYEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2025-12-11TSAAVA AND OTHERS v. GEORGIAEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2025-02-06ITALGOMME PNEUMATICI S.R.L. AND OTHERS v. ITALYEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2024-11-07BAKRADZE v. GEORGIAEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2024-10-22J.B. AND OTHERS v. MALTAEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2023-10-17A.D. v. MALTAEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2023-10-10INTERNATIONALE HUMANITÄRE HILFSORGANISATION E.V. v. GERMANYEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2023-09-26YÜKSEL YALÇINKAYA v. TÜRKİYEEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2023-06-01AYKHAN AKHUNDOV v. AZERBAIJANEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2022-12-13SEVDARI v. ALBANIAEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2022-10-06MUSTAFA HAJILI AND OTHERS v. AZERBAIJANEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2022-09-01MAKARASHVILI AND OTHERS v. GEORGIAEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2022-08-30KORPORATIVNA TARGOVSKA BANKA AD v. BULGARIAEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2022-08-30PÂRVU v. ROMANIAEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2022-06-14STOYANOVA v. BULGARIAEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2022-04-05NIT S.R.L. v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVAEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2022-03-15COMMUNAUTÉ GENEVOISE D'ACTION SYNDICALE (CGAS) v. SWITZERLANDEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2018-11-15NAVALNYY v. RUSSIAEuropean Court of Human Rights×2followed2017-06-27MEDŽLIS ISLAMSKE ZAJEDNICE BRČKO AND OTHERS v. BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINAEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2017-02-23DE TOMMASO v. ITALYEuropean Court of Human Rights2017-02-07LASHMANKIN AND OTHERS v. RUSSIAEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2016-05-17KARÁCSONY AND OTHERS v. HUNGARYEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2015-10-15KUDREVIČIUS AND OTHERS v. LITHUANIAEuropean Court of Human Rights2015-06-16DELFI AS v. ESTONIAEuropean Court of Human Rights2013-03-14BERNH LARSEN HOLDING AS AND OTHERS v. NORWAYEuropean Court of Human Rights2013-01-09OLEKSANDR VOLKOV v. UKRAINEEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2012-06-07CENTRO EUROPA 7 S.R.L. AND DI STEFANO v. ITALYEuropean Court of Human Rights2012-01-17STANEV v. BULGARIAEuropean Court of Human Rights2011-05-24ASSOCIATION "21 DECEMBER 1989" AND OTHERS v. ROMANIAEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2010-07-13KURIĆ AND OTHERS v. SLOVENIAEuropean Court of Human Rights2006-03-29COCCHIARELLA v. ITALYEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2004-07-08ILAŞCU AND OTHERS v. MOLDOVA AND RUSSIAEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed2004-04-08ASSANIDZE v. GEORGIAEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed

What it rests on

3 point outside the corpus. Read from the text, but no judgment held here answers to them. They are counted rather than hidden: this corpus is a slice, not the law.

Metropolitan Church of Bessarabia and Others v. Moldova, no. 45701/99See Morissens v. Belgium, no. 11389/85See Zihlmann v. Switzerland, no. 21861/93