Contract

the citation graph

LABITA v. ITALY

2000-04-06 · European Court of Human Rights · Council of Europe

read the judgment

1What it rests on

77Relied on since

0Departed from

Relied on since

The judgments that cite this one. This is the answer that tells you the case is still alive.

+18 earlier20212 judgments20225 judgments20238 judgments20247 judgments20253 judgments20267 judgments

77 judgments have relied on it, across 2000–2026

first 2000 · last 2026 · busiest 2023 (8 judgments)

2026-07-16KARIČKOVÁ v. THE CZECH REPUBLICEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed 2026-07-07GÜNANA v. BULGARIAEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed 2026-06-30EIKENAAR v. THE NETHERLANDSEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed 2026-04-21Y.F.C. AND OTHERS v. THE NETHERLANDSEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed 2026-03-05KRYUK v. UKRAINEEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed 2026-03-05ZINCHENKO AND TAMTURA v. UKRAINEEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed 2026-02-03O.H. AND OTHERS v. SERBIAEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed 2025-10-09GEORGIOS PAPADOPOULOS v. CYPRUSEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed 2025-07-10GULLOTTI v. ITALYEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed 2025-01-21PANAYOTOPOULOS AND OTHERS v. GREECEEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed 2024-10-10ELDAR HASANOV v. AZERBAIJANEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed 2024-08-27İ.G. v. TÜRKİYEEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed 2024-06-25UKRAINE v. RUSSIA (RE CRIMEA)European Court of Human Rightsfollowed 2024-05-16DOMENJOUD v. FRANCEEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed 2024-05-07TSAAVA AND OTHERS v. GEORGIAEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed 2024-01-16AL-HAWSAWI v. LITHUANIAEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed 2024-01-11D v. LATVIAEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed 2023-12-19O.J. AND J.O. v. GEORGIA AND RUSSIAEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed 2023-10-24MYSLIHAKA AND OTHERS v. ALBANIAEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed 2023-10-03EL-ASMAR v. DENMARKEuropean Court of Human Rights 2023-07-11SEMENYA v. SWITZERLANDEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed 2023-05-23A.E. v. BULGARIAEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed 2023-05-02S.P. AND OTHERS v. RUSSIAEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed 2023-02-21HYSA v. ALBANIAEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed 2023-01-19PAGERIE v. FRANCEEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed 2022-12-06KALDA v. ESTONIA (No. 2)European Court of Human Rightsfollowed 2022-10-06SUSLOV AND BATIKYAN v. UKRAINEEuropean Court of Human Rights 2022-07-07SAFI AND OTHERS v. GREECEEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed 2022-06-14L.B. v. LITHUANIAEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed 2022-03-31MASLÁK v. SLOVAKIA (No. 2)European Court of Human Rightsfollowed 2021-04-13AHMET HÜSREV ALTAN v. TURKEYEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed 2021-01-21SHMORGUNOV AND OTHERS v. UKRAINEEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed 2020-07-23M.K. AND OTHERS v. POLANDEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed 2019-11-19RAZVOZZHAYEV v. RUSSIA AND UKRAINE AND UDALTSOV v. RUSSIAEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed 2018-07-19S.M. v. CROATIAEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed 2018-03-20MEHMET HASAN ALTAN v. TURKEYEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed 2018-01-18NATIONAL FEDERATION OF SPORTSPERSONS' ASSOCIATIONS AND UNIONS (FNASS) AND OTHERS v. FRANCEEuropean Court of Human Rights 2017-11-28MERABISHVILI v. GEORGIAEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed 2017-03-30NAGMETOV v. RUSSIAEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed 2017-02-23DE TOMMASO v. ITALYEuropean Court of Human Rights×3followed 2016-12-15KHLAIFIA AND OTHERS v. ITALYEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed 2016-06-14MERABISHVILI v. GEORGIAEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed 2016-04-12R.B. v. HUNGARYEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed 2016-03-23BLOKHIN v. RUSSIAEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed 2015-11-05NAGMETOV v. RUSSIAEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed 2015-09-28BOUYID v. BELGIUMEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed 2015-09-01KHLAIFIA AND OTHERS v. ITALYEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed 2015-05-28Y. v. SLOVENIAEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed 2014-07-17SVINARENKO AND SLYADNEV v. RUSSIAEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed 2014-06-05AKOPYAN v. UKRAINEEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed 2013-11-28DVORSKI v. CROATIAEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed 2013-11-21BOUYID v. BELGIUMEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed 2013-10-21JANOWIEC AND OTHERS v. RUSSIAEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed 2013-10-15GUTSANOVI v. BULGARIAEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed 2012-12-11SVINARENKO AND SLYADNEV v. RUSSIAEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed 2012-11-13MOCANU AND OTHERS v. ROMANIAEuropean Court of Human Rights×2followed 2012-05-22IDALOV v. RUSSIAEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed 2012-01-17STANEV v. BULGARIAEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed 2012-01-10ANANYEV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIAEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed 2011-11-08V.C. v. SLOVAKIAEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed

showing 60 of 77

What it rests on

1999-07-28SELMOUNI v. FRANCEEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed

Departed from

No judgment recorded a departure from this one.

Departure is not detected yet, and the gap is deliberate. Searching for the words the Court might use was measured on 1,019 judgments: "depart from" appears 100 times and most often means departing from the facts found by a domestic court; "overruled" appears 44 times, usually about a domestic judgment; "abandon" appears 123 times, most often as abandoned firearms. Tightened to require the Court itself as the subject, precision was still around 40%, the rest being a dissenting judge complaining, or a national supreme court departing from its own case-law. Telling a lawyer an authority is dead when it is alive is worse than saying nothing, so nothing is what this says until each candidate can be judged properly.

not characterised

Most citations carry no word at all. The Court does not always say what it is doing when it cites one of its own judgments, and where it stayed silent nothing is inferred here.