Contract

the citation graph

WILLE v. LIECHTENSTEIN

1999-10-28 · European Court of Human Rights · Council of Europe

read the judgment

0What it rests on

28Relied on since

0Departed from

Relied on since

The judgments that cite this one. This is the answer that tells you the case is still alive.

+5 earlier20161 judgments6 years silent20226 judgments20237 judgments20242 judgments20254 judgments20263 judgments

28 judgments have relied on it, across 2000–2026

first 2000 · last 2026 · busiest 2023 (7 judgments)

2026-07-16G.K. AND A.S. v. SWITZERLANDEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed 2026-02-05MORAWIEC v. POLANDEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed 2026-01-27KHADIJA ISMAYILOVA v. AZERBAIJAN (No. 4)European Court of Human Rightsfollowed 2025-12-15DANILEŢ v. ROMANIAEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed 2025-05-27SELISHCHEVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIAEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed 2025-03-04MILASHINA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIAEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed 2025-02-11NOVAYA GAZETA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIAEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed 2024-11-07BAKRADZE v. GEORGIAEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed 2024-08-27BIELAU v. AUSTRIAEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed 2023-12-19NARBUTAS v. LITHUANIAEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed 2023-09-12EIGIRDAS AND VĮ "DEMOKRATIJOS PLĖTROS FONDAS" v. LITHUANIAEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed 2023-09-05RADIO BROADCASTING COMPANY B92 AD v. SERBIAEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed 2023-07-06TULEYA v. POLANDEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed 2023-06-27ZHABLYANOV v. BULGARIAEuropean Court of Human Rights 2023-05-30PRICOPE v. ROMANIAEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed 2023-01-23MACATĖ v. LITHUANIAEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed 2022-12-06MNATSAKANYAN v. ARMENIAEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed 2022-11-29GODENAU v. GERMANYEuropean Court of Human Rights 2022-11-08AYUSO TORRES v. SPAINEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed 2022-10-18STANCU AND OTHERS v. ROMANIAEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed 2022-07-12KOTLYAR v. RUSSIAEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed 2022-06-28M.D. AND OTHERS v. SPAINEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed 2016-06-23BAKA v. HUNGARYEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed 2014-05-27BAKA v. HUNGARYEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed 2011-09-12PALOMO SÁNCHEZ AND OTHERS v. SPAINEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed 2009-02-18ANDREJEVA v. LATVIAEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed 2004-12-17PEDERSEN AND BAADSGAARD v. DENMARKEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed 2000-05-04ROTARU v. ROMANIAEuropean Court of Human Rightsfollowed

What it rests on

No citation has been read out of this judgment.

The European Court does not publish its citations as data. They are read out of the text of the judgment itself. Until that reading reaches this judgment, it has no outgoing edge.

Departed from

No judgment recorded a departure from this one.

Departure is not detected yet, and the gap is deliberate. Searching for the words the Court might use was measured on 1,019 judgments: "depart from" appears 100 times and most often means departing from the facts found by a domestic court; "overruled" appears 44 times, usually about a domestic judgment; "abandon" appears 123 times, most often as abandoned firearms. Tightened to require the Court itself as the subject, precision was still around 40%, the rest being a dissenting judge complaining, or a national supreme court departing from its own case-law. Telling a lawyer an authority is dead when it is alive is worse than saying nothing, so nothing is what this says until each candidate can be judged properly.

not characterised

Most citations carry no word at all. The Court does not always say what it is doing when it cites one of its own judgments, and where it stayed silent nothing is inferred here.