the citation graph
United States v. Babcock; United States v. Hayden
1919-06-02 · Supreme Court of the United States · United States
0What it rests on
6Relied on since
0Departed from
Relied on since
The judgments that cite this one. This is the answer that tells you the case is still alive.
19211 judgments4 years silent19251 judgments19281 judgments12 years silent19401 judgments19431 judgments19441 judgments
6 judgments have relied on it, across 1921–1944
first 1921 · last 1944 · busiest 1921 (1 judgments)
1944-02-28STARK ET AL. v. WICKARD, SECRETARY OF AGRICULTURE, Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States1943-11-22SWITCHMEN’S UNION OF NORTH AMERICA Et Al. v. NATIONAL MEDIATION BOARD Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States1940-04-29PERKINS, SECRETARY OF LABOR, Et Al. v. LUKENS STEEL CO. Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States1928-05-14GREAT NORTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY, v. UNITED STATES Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States1925-03-02Work, Secretary of the Interior v. United States Ex Rel. RivesSupreme Court of the United States1921-01-24Geddes Et Al. v. Anaconda Copper Mining Company Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States
What it rests on
13 point outside the corpus. Read from the text, but no judgment held here answers to them. They are counted rather than hidden: this corpus is a slice, not the law.