United States v. Detroit Timber and Lumber Company; Martin-Alexander Lumber Company v. United States

1906-02-19 · Supreme Court of the United States · United States

read the judgment

0What it rests on

3Relied on since

0Departed from

Relied on since

The judgments that cite this one. This is the answer that tells you the case is still alive.

20111 judgments20131 judgments13 years silent20261 judgments

3 judgments have relied on it, across 2011–2026

first 2011 · last 2026 · busiest 2011 (1 judgments)

2026-06-30Trump v. BarbaraSupreme Court of the United States 2013-06-26Giridhar C. SEKHAR, Petitioner v. UNITED STATES.Supreme Court of the United States 2011-06-27GOODYEAR DUNLOP TIRES OPERATIONS, S. A., Et Al. v. BROWN Et Ux., Co-Administrators of the ESTATE OF BROWN, Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States

What it rests on

28 point outside the corpus. Read from the text, but no judgment held here answers to them. They are counted rather than hidden: this corpus is a slice, not the law.

Departed from

No judgment recorded a departure from this one.

Departure is not detected yet, and the gap is deliberate. Searching for the words the Court might use was measured on 1,019 judgments: "depart from" appears 100 times and most often means departing from the facts found by a domestic court; "overruled" appears 44 times, usually about a domestic judgment; "abandon" appears 123 times, most often as abandoned firearms. Tightened to require the Court itself as the subject, precision was still around 40%, the rest being a dissenting judge complaining, or a national supreme court departing from its own case-law. Telling a lawyer an authority is dead when it is alive is worse than saying nothing, so nothing is what this says until each candidate can be judged properly.

not characterised

Most citations carry no word at all. The Court does not always say what it is doing when it cites one of its own judgments, and where it stayed silent nothing is inferred here.