the citation graph
Donald J. ROBINSON, Appellant, v. the STATE of Texas, Appellee
1985-10-23 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · United States
10What it rests on
4Relied on since
0Departed from
Relied on since
The judgments that cite this one. This is the answer that tells you the case is still alive.
19851 judgments19871 judgments19881 judgments19911 judgments
4 judgments have relied on it, across 1985–1991
first 1985 · last 1991 · busiest 1985 (1 judgments)
1991-06-19Patrick Logan MONTGOMERY, Appellant, v. the STATE of Texas, AppelleeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas×31988-01-14John Arthur RODDA, Appellant, v. the STATE of Texas, AppelleeCourt of Appeals of Texas1987-05-20Herman Ray CANTRELL, Appellant, v. the STATE of Texas, AppelleeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas1985-04-24Lester BOUTWELL, Appellant, v. the STATE of Texas, AppelleeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas×2
What it rests on
1985-10-09Bobby James MOORE, Appellant, v. the STATE of Texas, AppelleeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas×21985-07-10Danny Marshall MORGAN, Appellant, v. the STATE of Texas, AppelleeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas×31985-06-19Jeffrey D. PLANTE, Appellant, v. the STATE of Texas, AppelleeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas×31983-12-21Clyde WILLIAMS, Jr. & David Lee Smith, Appellant, v. the STATE of Texas, AppelleeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas×21983-04-06Lonnie Quincy PRIOR, Appellant, v. the STATE of Texas, AppelleeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas×21983-03-30Robert Louis ELKINS, Appellant, v. the STATE of Texas, AppelleeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas×21978-10-25UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Orange Jell BEECHUM, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit×21974-07-24David Jackson CRAWLEY, Appellant, v. the STATE of Texas, AppelleeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas×21974-07-10Bufford Lenell MCDONALD, Alias Joe McDonald, Appellant, v. the STATE of Texas, AppelleeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas×21972-09-25Ervin Herman ALBRECHT, Appellant, v. the STATE of Texas, AppelleeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas×2
10 point outside the corpus. Read from the text, but no judgment held here answers to them. They are counted rather than hidden: this corpus is a slice, not the law.