John Kenneth Danby, vs. the Osteopathic Hospital Association of Delaware, a Corporation of the State of Delaware

1954-05-11 · Supreme Court of Delaware · United States

read the judgment

1What it rests on

4Relied on since

0Departed from

Relied on since

The judgments that cite this one. This is the answer that tells you the case is still alive.

19711 judgments5 years silent19761 judgments19791 judgments7 years silent19861 judgments

4 judgments have relied on it, across 1971–1986

first 1971 · last 1986 · busiest 1971 (1 judgments)

1986-10-30Sylvia Martin MANN and R. Allen Martin, Trustees Under Deed of Trust Dated June 26, 1972, for the Benefit of Alana Martin Frumkes, and R. Allan Martin, Individually, Plaintiffs Below, Appellants, v. OPPENHEIMER & CO., a Delaware Corporation, Defendant Below, AppelleeSupreme Court of Delaware 1979-11-28William B. WEINBERGER, Plaintiff, v. UOP, INC., Et Al., DefendantsCourt of Chancery of Delaware 1976-11-23LAVENTHOL, KREKSTEIN, HORWATH & HORWATH and Horwath & Horwath, Defendants Below, Appellants, v. Mervyn TUCKMAN, Plaintiff Below, AppelleeSupreme Court of Delaware 1971-06-15DAVID J. GREENE & CO. Et Al., Plaintiffs, v. SCHENLEY INDUSTRIES, INC., Et Al., DefendantsCourt of Chancery of Delaware

What it rests on

1953-11-18Danby v. Osteopathic Hospital Ass'n of DelawareCourt of Chancery of Delaware

Departed from

No judgment recorded a departure from this one.

Departure is not detected yet, and the gap is deliberate. Searching for the words the Court might use was measured on 1,019 judgments: "depart from" appears 100 times and most often means departing from the facts found by a domestic court; "overruled" appears 44 times, usually about a domestic judgment; "abandon" appears 123 times, most often as abandoned firearms. Tightened to require the Court itself as the subject, precision was still around 40%, the rest being a dissenting judge complaining, or a national supreme court departing from its own case-law. Telling a lawyer an authority is dead when it is alive is worse than saying nothing, so nothing is what this says until each candidate can be judged properly.

not characterised

Most citations carry no word at all. The Court does not always say what it is doing when it cites one of its own judgments, and where it stayed silent nothing is inferred here.