State of New Jersey, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. John E. Tischio, Defendant-Appellant

1987-06-30 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · United States

read the judgment

5What it rests on

5Relied on since

0Departed from

Relied on since

The judgments that cite this one. This is the answer that tells you the case is still alive.

19891 judgments19911 judgments19921 judgments10 years silent20021 judgments20051 judgments

5 judgments have relied on it, across 1989–2005

first 1989 · last 2005 · busiest 1989 (1 judgments)

2005-01-12The STATE of Texas v. Matthew Reid MECHLER, AppelleeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas×2 2002-09-27Charles J. CONRAD, Appellant, v. STATE of Alaska, AppelleeCourt of Appeals of Alaska 1992-03-19Haas v. StateSupreme Court of Florida 1991-09-26Miller v. StateSupreme Court of Florida 1989-12-11STATE OF HAWAII, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. GARY DAVID WETZEL, Defendant-AppellantHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals

What it rests on

1986-05-01STATE of Idaho, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Mary Lou KNOLL, Defendant-AppellantIdaho Court of Appeals 1986-02-26State v. TischioNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division 1985-08-30State of Vermont v. Gregory J. DumontSupreme Court of Vermont 1983-12-15Fuenning v. SUPER. CT. IN AND FOR CTY. OF MARICOPAArizona Supreme Court 1980-04-01State of West Virginia v. Danny Lee BallWest Virginia Supreme Court

38 point outside the corpus. Read from the text, but no judgment held here answers to them. They are counted rather than hidden: this corpus is a slice, not the law.

Departed from

No judgment recorded a departure from this one.

Departure is not detected yet, and the gap is deliberate. Searching for the words the Court might use was measured on 1,019 judgments: "depart from" appears 100 times and most often means departing from the facts found by a domestic court; "overruled" appears 44 times, usually about a domestic judgment; "abandon" appears 123 times, most often as abandoned firearms. Tightened to require the Court itself as the subject, precision was still around 40%, the rest being a dissenting judge complaining, or a national supreme court departing from its own case-law. Telling a lawyer an authority is dead when it is alive is worse than saying nothing, so nothing is what this says until each candidate can be judged properly.

not characterised

Most citations carry no word at all. The Court does not always say what it is doing when it cites one of its own judgments, and where it stayed silent nothing is inferred here.