the citation graph
Leroy BATES, Appellant, v. the STATE of Texas, Appellee
1982-12-15 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · United States
8What it rests on
6Relied on since
0Departed from
Relied on since
The judgments that cite this one. This is the answer that tells you the case is still alive.
19833 judgments19861 judgments19872 judgments
6 judgments have relied on it, across 1983–1987
first 1983 · last 1987 · busiest 1983 (3 judgments)
1987-10-07LaStarza MANNIE, Appellant, v. the STATE of Texas, AppelleeTexas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)×21987-05-20Herman Ray CANTRELL, Appellant, v. the STATE of Texas, AppelleeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas1986-04-23Bobby TEMPLIN, Appellant, v. the STATE of Texas, AppelleeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas1983-12-21Clyde WILLIAMS, Jr. & David Lee Smith, Appellant, v. the STATE of Texas, AppelleeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas×21983-04-06Lonnie Quincy PRIOR, Appellant, v. the STATE of Texas, AppelleeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas1983-03-30Robert Louis ELKINS, Appellant, v. the STATE of Texas, AppelleeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
What it rests on
1980-09-24Carlos Rene RUBIO, Appellant, v. the STATE of Texas, AppelleeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas×21980-02-06Sam R. SANDERS, Jr., Appellant, v. the STATE of Texas, AppelleeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas×21979-12-19Oscar CARRILLO, Appellant, v. the STATE of Texas, AppelleeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas×21979-10-10James Alvin MURPHY, Appellant, v. the STATE of Texas, AppelleeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas×21978-12-13Ray Leroy MULCHAHEY, Appellant, v. the STATE of Texas, AppelleeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas×21978-11-01Virgil John ETCHIESON, Appellant, v. the STATE of Texas, AppelleeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas×21978-06-21Jessie Ray JONES, Appellant, v. the STATE of Texas, AppelleeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas×21974-01-16Robert Earl RANSOM, Appellant, v. the STATE of Texas, AppelleeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas×2
11 point outside the corpus. Read from the text, but no judgment held here answers to them. They are counted rather than hidden: this corpus is a slice, not the law.