the citation graph
ROADWAY EXPRESS, INC. v. PIPER Et Al.
1980-06-23 · Supreme Court of the United States · United States
8What it rests on
5Relied on since
0Departed from
Relied on since
The judgments that cite this one. This is the answer that tells you the case is still alive.
19911 judgments19941 judgments19971 judgments19981 judgments7 years silent20051 judgments
5 judgments have relied on it, across 1991–2005
first 1991 · last 2005 · busiest 1991 (1 judgments)
2005-07-05Thomas T.S. KAUNG, Plaintiff-Below, Appellant, v. COLE NATIONAL CORPORATION, a Delaware Corporation Defendant-Below, AppelleeSupreme Court of Delaware1998-11-19H. Frederick JOHNSTON, Sandra Spillane and Technicorp International II, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, Defendants Below, Appellants, v. ARBITRIUM (CAYMAN ISLANDS) HANDELS AG and Miklos Vendel, Plaintiffs Below, AppelleesSupreme Court of Delaware1997-05-27ARBITRIUM (CAYMAN ISLANDS) HANDELS AG and Miklos Vendel, Plaintiffs, v. H. Frederick JOHNSTON, Sandra Spillane and Technicorp International II, Inc., DefendantsCourt of Chancery of Delaware1994-06-16Ellen v. SPAIN, Appellant, v. Tony E. GALLEGOS, Chairman, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission; United States of AmericaThird Circuit1991-08-02Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States
What it rests on
1975-05-12Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness Society Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States1973-05-21HALL Et Al. v. COLESupreme Court of the United States1968-03-18NEWMAN Et Al. v. PIGGIE PARK ENTERPRISES, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States1967-05-08FLEISCHMANN DISTILLING CORP. Et Al. v. MAIER BREWING CO. Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States1962-06-25Link v. Wabash Railroad Co.Supreme Court of the United States1962-06-25VAUGHAN v. ATKINSON Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States1958-06-16SOCIETE INTERNATIONALE POUR PARTICIPATIONS INDUSTRIELLES ET COMMERCIALES, S. A., v. ROGERS, ATTORNEY GENERAL, SUCCESSOR TO THE ALIEN PROPERTY CUSTODIAN, Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States1923-04-09Toledo Scale Company v. Computing Scale Company; Fidelity & Deposit Company of Maryland Et Al. v. Computing Scale Company Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States
19 point outside the corpus. Read from the text, but no judgment held here answers to them. They are counted rather than hidden: this corpus is a slice, not the law.