SIMMONS Et Al v. UNITED STATES

1968-03-18 · Supreme Court of the United States · United States

read the judgment

4What it rests on

5Relied on since

0Departed from

Relied on since

The judgments that cite this one. This is the answer that tells you the case is still alive.

19701 judgments19731 judgments19751 judgments24 years silent19991 judgments20011 judgments

5 judgments have relied on it, across 1970–2001

first 1970 · last 2001 · busiest 1970 (1 judgments)

2001-09-12Johnny Ray CONNER, Appellant, v. the STATE of TexasCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas 1999-10-20Ramiro Rubi IBARRA, Appellant, v. the STATE of TexasCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas 1975-10-15Mary Helen HALLIBURTON, Appellant, v. the STATE of Texas, AppelleeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas×2 1973-05-14UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. George BROADWAY, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit 1970-02-06UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Ronald Raymond RAVICH and Edward McConnell, Defendants-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit

What it rests on

1967-06-12United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States 1963-03-18SHOTWELL MANUFACTURING CO. Et Al. v. UNITED STATESSupreme Court of the United States 1961-10-09Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States 1960-03-28Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States

24 point outside the corpus. Read from the text, but no judgment held here answers to them. They are counted rather than hidden: this corpus is a slice, not the law.

Departed from

No judgment recorded a departure from this one.

Departure is not detected yet, and the gap is deliberate. Searching for the words the Court might use was measured on 1,019 judgments: "depart from" appears 100 times and most often means departing from the facts found by a domestic court; "overruled" appears 44 times, usually about a domestic judgment; "abandon" appears 123 times, most often as abandoned firearms. Tightened to require the Court itself as the subject, precision was still around 40%, the rest being a dissenting judge complaining, or a national supreme court departing from its own case-law. Telling a lawyer an authority is dead when it is alive is worse than saying nothing, so nothing is what this says until each candidate can be judged properly.

not characterised

Most citations carry no word at all. The Court does not always say what it is doing when it cites one of its own judgments, and where it stayed silent nothing is inferred here.