the citation graph
POE Et Al. v. ULLMAN, STATE'S ATTORNEY
1961-10-09 · Supreme Court of the United States · United States
11What it rests on
6Relied on since
0Departed from
Relied on since
The judgments that cite this one. This is the answer that tells you the case is still alive.
19631 judgments19651 judgments19681 judgments19702 judgments19721 judgments
6 judgments have relied on it, across 1963–1972
first 1963 · last 1972 · busiest 1970 (2 judgments)
1972-06-26Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States1970-05-18In Re WinshipSupreme Court of the United States1970-03-09BARLOW Et Al. v. COLLINS, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, ALABAMA AGRICULTURAL STABILIZATION AND CONSERVATION SERVICE, Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States1968-06-10FLAST Et Al. v. COHEN, SECRETARY OF HEALTH, EDUCATION, AND WELFARE, Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States1965-04-05Pointer v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States1963-03-18Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States
What it rests on
1943-06-07Tot v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States1937-03-01AETNA LIFE INSURANCE CO. v. HAWORTH Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States1936-02-17ASHWANDER Et Al. v. TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States1925-06-01Pierce, Governor of Oregon, Et Al. v. Society of Sisters; Pierce, Governor of Oregon, Et Al. v. Hill Military AcademySupreme Court of the United States1923-11-12Terrace Et Al. v. Thompson, Attorney General of the State of WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States1923-06-11Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Mellon, Secretary of the Treasury, Et Al.; Frothingham v. Mellon, Secretary of the Treasury, Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States1922-02-27Fairchild v. Hughes, as Secretary of State of the United States, Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States1915-11-01Truax and the Attorney General of the State of Arizona v. RaichSupreme Court of the United States1911-02-20Muskrat v. United States; Brown and Gritts v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States1892-02-29Chicago & Grand Trunk Railway Company v. WellmanSupreme Court of the United States1886-02-01Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States
126 point outside the corpus. Read from the text, but no judgment held here answers to them. They are counted rather than hidden: this corpus is a slice, not the law.