the citation graph
BARROWS Et Al. v. JACKSON
1953-06-15 · Supreme Court of the United States · United States
11What it rests on
3Relied on since
0Departed from
Relied on since
The judgments that cite this one. This is the answer that tells you the case is still alive.
19681 judgments19701 judgments27 years silent19971 judgments
3 judgments have relied on it, across 1968–1997
first 1968 · last 1997 · busiest 1968 (1 judgments)
1997-03-19BENNETT Et Al. v. SPEAR Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States1970-03-03ASSOCIATION OF DATA PROCESSING SERVICE ORGANIZATIONS, INC., Et Al. v. CAMP, COMPTROLLER OF THE CURRENCY, Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States1968-06-10FLAST Et Al. v. COHEN, SECRETARY OF HEALTH, EDUCATION, AND WELFARE, Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States
What it rests on
1942-06-01COLUMBIA BROADCASTING SYSTEM, INC. v. UNITED STATES Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States1940-03-25Federal Communications Commission v. Sanders Brothers Radio StationSupreme Court of the United States1939-06-05COLEMAN Et Al. v. MILLER, SECRETARY OF THE SENATE OF THE STATE OF KANSAS, Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States1939-01-30TENNESSEE ELECTRIC POWER CO. Et Al. v. TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States1938-01-03ALABAMA POWER CO. v. ICKES, FEDERAL EMERGENCY ADMINISTRATOR OF PUBLIC WORKS, Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States1936-02-17ASHWANDER Et Al. v. TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States1925-06-01Pierce, Governor of Oregon, Et Al. v. Society of Sisters; Pierce, Governor of Oregon, Et Al. v. Hill Military AcademySupreme Court of the United States1923-06-11Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Mellon, Secretary of the Treasury, Et Al.; Frothingham v. Mellon, Secretary of the Treasury, Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States1922-02-27Fairchild v. Hughes, as Secretary of State of the United States, Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States1915-11-01Truax and the Attorney General of the State of Arizona v. RaichSupreme Court of the United States1821-03-18Cohens v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States
38 point outside the corpus. Read from the text, but no judgment held here answers to them. They are counted rather than hidden: this corpus is a slice, not the law.